xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kdb: task_has_cpu not found

To: Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kdb: task_has_cpu not found
From: george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ionut Georgescu)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:44:20 +0100
In-reply-to: <1013643185.5390.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020213232136.GA31067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1013643185.5390.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Yes ... it was somewhere there on the list :)) It seemed that the
original files had all gone into *.orig's after applying the patch ...
Therefore my grep -r theory.

Is there a way to solve this ? I have turned kdb off meanwhile and I'm
prepairing to reboot.


On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:33:05PM -0800, Thomas Duffy wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 15:21, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > i was trying to compile a 2.4.17 kernel with the cvs patch from
> > 20020210. However, linking the kernel fails because task_has_cpu, which
> > is called in kdbmain.c, is not defined. Indeed, grep -r task_has_cpu *
> > in the linux tree showed only one occurence: the one in kdbmain. Am I
> > missing something here ?
> 
> did you apply ingo's o1 sched patch as well?  this will get rid of this
> function.
> 
> -tduffy
> 

-- 
***************
* Ionut Georgescu
* http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/
* Registered Linux User #244479
*
* "In Windows you can do everything Microsoft wants you to do; in Unix you
*                can do anything the computer is able to do."


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>