| To: | <be@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | AW: AW: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD |
| From: | "mai99bxd" <mai99bxd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:36:55 +0100 |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <3C6845BD.C4DD497D@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>Not the old one of XFS 1.0.2 for RH7.1 from oss.sgi.com, but a very old >kernel compiled by myself. ;-) >Rebooted to single user mode using that very old kernel. All filesystems >online. Set up network with ifconfig. Ping fileserver. Listen on a TCP >port with netcat's output redirected to a file in /tmp. Tar the original >RPMs on the fileserver and pipe with netcat to the crying box. Untar >this file in /tmp. rpm -Uhv --nodeps --oldpackage *rpm. 20 min later. >;-) Uhh - that sounds like me when I must use vi in single user mode, because mc isn't work. If I compile and boot up a new kernel (and I never use RPM kernels), I let stay the current in the lilo. So nothing happens if I compile some trash. Bye ALEX http://alexk.homeip.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: AW: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: AW: AW: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: AW: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: AW: AW: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |