xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Current status of 2.5.x

To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Current status of 2.5.x
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:55:05 -0600
Cc: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Vernon McPherron <vernon@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020211213034.P729@xxxxxxx>
References: <20020211213034.P729@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ahh...that explains what I saw on the LVM list then. Thanks!

On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 14:30, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11 2002, Stephen Lord wrote:
> > Vernon McPherron wrote:
> > 
> > >I haven't been following the 2.5.x branch lately.  Does the XFS CVS 
> > >branch support LVM and MD, or does it still need work?  I understood 
> > >that early 2.5 trees the vfs was quite different from the 2.4 vfs.
> > >
> > >I guess this should really go to the Kernel mailing list, just
> curious 
> > >to know of those using the 2.5 cvs tree are using LVM & MD.
> > >
> > >Thanks.
> > >
> > >-=/Vernon McPherron/=-
> > 
> > So far as I know, md in 2.5 should be working, lvm is totally broken, 
> 
> raid0 and raid1 works perfectly, raid5 does not. raid1 over raid0 has
> resync problems unless you change the resync bio size, but apart from
> that it should be perfect.
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>