Re: Current status of 2.5.x

[Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>]

Vernon McPherron wrote:

> I haven't been following the 2.5.x branch lately.  Does the XFS CVS 
> branch support LVM and MD, or does it still need work?  I understood 
> that early 2.5 trees the vfs was quite different from the 2.4 vfs.
> I guess this should really go to the Kernel mailing list, just curious 
> to know of those using the 2.5 cvs tree are using LVM & MD.
> Thanks.
>
> -=/Vernon McPherron/=-
So far as I know, md in 2.5 should be working, lvm is totally broken, 
and no one is attempting
to fix it. Sistina shows no sign of working on it, they released a 
rewrite of lvm in 2.4 instead.
Steve