| To: | Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [NEWS] Extended attributes interface changes |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Feb 2002 12:52:54 +1100 |
| Cc: | Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202021151090.5765-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 11:52:38AM +0800 |
| References: | <20020201101545.G88469@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202021151090.5765-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 11:52:38AM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:15, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Yes, the ondisk formats remain unchanged, incl. the ondisk ACL format > > (which is also the same as the IRIX/XFS Posix ACL format). > > So setups utilizing ACLs won't have to be redone, right? As long as we > make sure that when we upgrade to an XFS-enabled kernel using the new > system calls we also upgrade the userland stuff or we won't be able to > modify or view the ACL rules. Did I get things correctly? :) > yes. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs, Stephen Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LVM1 & XFS, Adrian Head |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [NEWS] Extended attributes interface changes, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Permit xfs_repair -n on readonly device, Chris Pascoe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |