| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Feb 2002 05:10:59 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, King Kac <kacperw@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1012590178.26396.429.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20020201142828.037499a0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020131210325.C966@comotion> <B87F3B30.17EF%gnydick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20020201142828.037499a0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20020201185638.03660ee8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020201193334.A24652@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1012590178.26396.429.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:02:58PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote: > > When you can find the inode of the deleted file again and its extent btrees > > are not destroyed it should be possible to reconnect it to a directory. > > Unfortunately when we free an inode we also remove all the extents from > it. So even if those extents used to be in the inode, they are not there > now. The reason this happens is that deleting a file is an unbounded I see. The extents would be in a btree which would be likely rebalanced on the extent freeing and that would destroy them because they're inline in the btree. Is that correct? Thanks, -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [NEWS] Extended attributes interface changes, Federico Sevilla III |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [NEWS] Extended attributes interface changes, Ethan Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs, Stephen Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |