Re: xfs + rmap?

To:	Adam McKenna <adam-dated-1013037964.328bbc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: xfs + rmap?
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:02:09 -0600 (CST)
Cc:	<linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<20020201232604.GK23997@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Adam McKenna wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:28:22PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote:
> > The rpms on oss.sgi.com are -ac kernels.
>
> Including the 2.4.14 one?


Nope, only the "RH" ones are based on -ac.

2.4.14 is pure, unalancoxified Linux.

-Eric

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: xfs + rmap?, (continued) Re: xfs + rmap?, Austin Gonyou Re: xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna Re: xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna Re: xfs + rmap?, Austin Gonyou Re: xfs + rmap?, Austin Gonyou Re: xfs + rmap?, Steve Lord Re: xfs + rmap?, Austin Gonyou Re: xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna Re: xfs + rmap?, Steve Lord Re: xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna Re: xfs + rmap?, Eric Sandeen <= Re: xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna Re: xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna Re: xfs + rmap?, Shawn Starr Re: xfs + rmap?, Kevin M. Kilbride

Previous by Date:	Re: Yet another patch question, Keith Owens
Next by Date:	Re: xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna
Previous by Thread:	Re: xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna
Next by Thread:	Re: xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]