| To: | "Stephenson, Dale" <dstephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Oops unmounting snapshot of xfs filesystem |
| From: | Adrian Head <ahead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:44:02 +1000 |
| In-reply-to: | <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B02F08F@cdserv.meridian-data.com> |
| References: | <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B02F08F@cdserv.meridian-data.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> Kernel 2.4.16 with 12/14/01 xfs CVS. There has been heaps of work with respect to XFS and LVM since December last year; therefore, I recommend that you try the current 2.4.17-xfs CVS. If you don't like CVS kernels then use the split patches for 2.4.17-xfs (these however, won't have all the latest bug fixes). I am running 2.4.17-xfs (CVS) with LVM-1.0.2 with the xfs_fs_freeze patch and I'm not seening your exact problem. However, there is a bug at the moment that doesn't flush all inodes to disk on a freeze so the snapshot is not consistant. The SGI guys are working on this at the moment. PS. I think the xfs_fs_freeze patch is actually in the CVS now. > LVM CVS of 1/21/02 (functionally identical to 1.0.2, I believe). > LVM's linux-2.4.11-VFS-lock.patch. > xfs_fs_freeze() patch posted by Eric Sandeen. -- Adrian Head (Public Key available on request.) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OT] XFS for Red Hat Linux installer - how did you do it?, Martin Stricker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OT] XFS for Red Hat Linux installer - how did you do it?, Martin K. Petersen |
| Previous by Thread: | Oops unmounting snapshot of xfs filesystem, Stephenson, Dale |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Oops unmounting snapshot of xfs filesystem, Klaus Strebel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |