| To: | Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [NEWS] Extended attributes interface changes |
| From: | Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:52:38 +0800 (PHT) |
| In-reply-to: | <20020201101545.G88469@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:15, Nathan Scott wrote: > Yes, the ondisk formats remain unchanged, incl. the ondisk ACL format > (which is also the same as the IRIX/XFS Posix ACL format). So setups utilizing ACLs won't have to be redone, right? As long as we make sure that when we upgrade to an XFS-enabled kernel using the new system calls we also upgrade the userland stuff or we won't be able to modify or view the ACL rules. Did I get things correctly? :) --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III :: jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc. GnuPG Key: http://jijo.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs + rmap?, Shawn Starr |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | xfs + rmap?, Adam McKenna |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [NEWS] Extended attributes interface changes, Ethan Benson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |