xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Yet another patch question

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Yet another patch question
From: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 11:05:17 +1100
Cc: David Chambers <davidc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "01 Feb 2002 08:59:24 MDT." <1012575564.26396.297.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 01 Feb 2002 08:59:24 -0600, 
Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 08:16, David Chambers wrote:
>> While we are(were!) on the subject of patches, has anyone successfully
>> applied the XFS patch to a rmap12a patched kernel?  (or vice versa)
>
>The tricky part here is that our tree also has kdb in it, if you
>subtract out kdb then it gets a lot easier in general to apply
>xfs to other random kernels.

kdb v2.1 (in current xfs tree) should not be a problem with vm changes,
I removed the kdb dependency on the vm source code.  Module
kdb/kdbm_vm.c will be a problem for rmap, so patch kdb/modules/Makefile
to remove kdbm_vm.o and just don't build it.

>Although when it comes to vm changes
>we have code in buffer.c and vmscan.c which it is essential to
>get right.

/me runs away ;)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>