| To: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c |
| From: | "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:19:51 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Steve Lord" <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1012336870.26363.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:41:10 -0600, Steve Lord wrote: [...] >> So with Andi's patch one should NOT enable V1 directories, or otherwise the XFS >> code can't read existing V2 filesystems anymore? Is that right? > > >Noooo, I think you got your 1s and 2s crossed in there. Andi was turning >off the backwards compatibility with old irix filesystems (V1) in the >patch. It is not exactly a huge win spacewise, but every little helps. >This will not affect any existing filesystem made on linux since they >all use the V2 code. Oh, sorry, stupid me. :-) Thanks for setting this straight. -- Verkaufe Original-BMW-Raeder: L I N U X .~. http://adsl-bergs.rz.rwth-aachen.de/~rabe The Choice /V\ of a GNU /( )\ Generation ^^-^^ |
| Previous by Date: | How long should an xfs_freeze take?, Chris Pascoe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How long should an xfs_freeze take?, Stephen Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |