| To: | "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 29 Jan 2002 14:46:11 -0600 |
| Cc: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <E16VerN-0006ud-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E16VerN-0006ud-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 14:28, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > So with Andi's patch one should NOT enable V1 directories, or otherwise the > XFS > code can't read existing V2 filesystems anymore? Is that right? No, with Andi's patch, you can turn V1 on and off, but V2 is always there. Oh, also, I don't think Andi's patch quite works. There are dir2 functions that call code in xfs_dir.c - which is not linked in w/ Andi's patch. Andi, did you load your module? :) -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c, Ralf G. R. Bergs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |