xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function x

To: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Jan 2002 14:46:11 -0600
Cc: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <E16VerN-0006ud-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E16VerN-0006ud-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 14:28, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:

> So with Andi's patch one should NOT enable V1 directories, or otherwise the 
> XFS 
> code can't read existing V2 filesystems anymore? Is that right?

No, with Andi's patch, you can turn V1 on and off, but V2 is always
there.

Oh, also, I don't think Andi's patch quite works.  There are dir2
functions that call code in xfs_dir.c - which is not linked in w/ Andi's
patch.  Andi, did you load your module?  :)

-Eric


-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>