xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Mandrake 8.1 exhibits xfs/nfs umask problem

To: "'Shiv Sikand'" <sikand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Mandrake 8.1 exhibits xfs/nfs umask problem
From: "Christian, Chip" <chip_christian@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:03:57 -0500
Cc: chmouel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
This sounds like it could, maybe, possibly, be related to what I
encountered some time back.  Bottom line is that the permission
bits of a newly created file are a logical and of the default acl
of the containing directory and the bits passed to creat.  Do you
have a default acl set on the directory involved, and does it have 
the bits masked off that you see as missing?

        -Chip

-----Original Message-----
From: Shiv Sikand [mailto:sikand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 4:14
To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: chmouel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Mandrake 8.1 exhibits xfs/nfs umask problem


We have observed that the Mandrake 8.1 kernel exhibits a umask problem when xfs 
volumes are exported with nfs.

If a new directory is created via nfs on an xfs volume, the umask from the 
current process is not inherited. 

Reading the mail archive, it looks like this problem or something extremely 
similar was fixed in the XFS tree a long time ago.

We do not observe this problem with 2.4.5-xfs-1.0.1 which has been our 
production kernel  prior to the arrival of XFS support in Mandrake.

Can someone please take a look at the xfs code in the Mandrake build and 
confirm the problem.

Thanks,
Shiv


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>