xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Seperate log location [Was: Re: How to create a separate log]

To: Nic Doye <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Seperate log location [Was: Re: How to create a separate log]
From: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:37:37 +0100
>received: from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025B557306; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:37:38 +0100 (CET)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Sauter AG, Basel
References: <20020126111331.A5571@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3C5306E1.8040408@xxxxxxx> <1012211803.2094.8.camel@pyewacket>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Nic Doye schrieb:
> 
> On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 19:43, Stephen Lord wrote:
> 
> > Default log location is in the middle of the partition/volume you run
> > mkfs on.
> > If you want an external log then you need to dedicate a partition to it,
> > it cannot
> > be in a file.
> >
> > These are the options for an external log:
> >
> > mkfs -t xfs -l logdev=/dev/xxx,size=XXXb /dev/yyy
> > mount -t xfs -o logdev=/dev/xxx /dev/yyy /mnt
> 
> Just a small question for those people who use external logs. Do you put
> them on the same disk (or disk set) or do you put them on a seperate
> disk (and indeed, seperate controller).
> 
> If you do put them on a seperate disk, is it mirrored? To a seperate
> controller?
> 
> I'm just thinking, that to build a fault tolerant, yet high throughput
> server could start costing a lot of cash... On the otherhand, does
> (hardware) RAID5 push the performance down so low, that an external log
> won't improve things anyway.
> 
> nic

Software RAID5 and the log on Software RAID1 on the same disks works
very fine for me. You'll need a really expensive Hardware RAID
controller to get better performance!

I think it's very important to put the log on RAID too otherwise your
RAID5 is useless, isn't it?

-Simon



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>