[Top] [All Lists]

Re: double mounting and other strangeness.

To: pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: double mounting and other strangeness.
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 27 Jan 2002 18:42:49 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020127173852.A14538@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020127173852.A14538@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I believe the main reason is for snapshotting purposes, backup, RO file
usage, etc. 

On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 17:38, pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 10:18:57AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> > >> That is normal with any recent 2.4 kernel, it applies to all
> > >> filesystems, not just XFS.  You can even mount different file
> system
> > >  Doesn't this seem BAD for an OS to allow? 
> > The Linux VFS gurus have said they want this.  If you disagree, please
> > take it up on the vfs or kernel mailing lists, it is out of our
> > control.
>   Is there any legitimate reason you would want to do this? I dont
> want to scream at them if there is a good reason for it. What is the
> opinion of the FS developers here?
> -Phil Carinhas
> --
>  .--------------------------------------------------------.
>  | Dr. Philip A. Carinhas       | pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx      |
>  | Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.com   |
>  `--------------------------------------------------------'
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>