On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 09:44, Matthijs van der Klip wrote:
> > The tricky part with all of this is we probably should to fold in the
> > appropriate xfs fixes from the cvs tree, there are a lot of them since
> > these rpms were spun.
> But then it wouldn't be an 'official' release (1.0.2) anymore, would it?
But then why would we bother with the redhat update at all? Same
argument applies in my mind.
> Matthijs van der Klip
Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx