[Top] [All Lists]

RE: New Kernel RPMs

To: Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: New Kernel RPMs
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Jan 2002 09:46:27 -0600
Cc: "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <35F87783B600D411A1430060943F469A589756@EXCHANGE>
References: <35F87783B600D411A1430060943F469A589756@EXCHANGE>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 09:44, Matthijs van der Klip wrote:
> > The tricky part with all of this is we probably should to fold in the
> > appropriate xfs fixes from the cvs tree, there are a lot of them since
> > these rpms were spun.
> But then it wouldn't be an 'official' release (1.0.2) anymore, would it?

But then why would we bother with the redhat update at all? Same
argument applies in my mind.


> Regards,
> Matthijs van der Klip

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>