xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: New Kernel RPMs

To: Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: New Kernel RPMs
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Jan 2002 09:46:27 -0600
Cc: "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <35F87783B600D411A1430060943F469A589756@EXCHANGE>
References: <35F87783B600D411A1430060943F469A589756@EXCHANGE>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 09:44, Matthijs van der Klip wrote:
> > The tricky part with all of this is we probably should to fold in the
> > appropriate xfs fixes from the cvs tree, there are a lot of them since
> > these rpms were spun.
> 
> But then it wouldn't be an 'official' release (1.0.2) anymore, would it?

But then why would we bother with the redhat update at all? Same
argument applies in my mind.

Steve

> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Matthijs van der Klip
-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>