| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New Kernel RPMs |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:47:35 -0600 (CST) |
| Cc: | Theo Van Dinter <felicity@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1011886690.23153.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 24 Jan 2002, Steve Lord wrote: > I really think a new lvm needs a lot of soak time before we spin it > into a package. The 1.0.1 code has stack overflows with xfs, I have > no idea about the new code at all, I thought it was going to be a 2.0 > release, or is that something different. The new 1.0.2 LVM code does fix the stack overflow we saw (for 2.4.4+, anyway). LVM 2.0 is a complete rewrite, probably a while yet until it's released in any stable form. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New Kernel RPMs, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: New Kernel RPMs, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New Kernel RPMs, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | RE: New Kernel RPMs, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |