xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Various anaconda installer fixes

To: Blizbor <tb670725@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Various anaconda installer fixes
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 23 Jan 2002 15:43:32 -0600
Cc: angus <boiteaflood@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3C4F2C4D.7090206@xxxxxx>
References: <1011807822.12843.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1011808354.32690.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3C4F2C4D.7090206@xxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hm, I assume this is the same behavior as the standard Red Hat 7.2? I
don't think anything we did should have changed this behavior... and
unfortunately I don't think we have the bandwidth to fix problems not
related to XFS....

-Eric

On Wed, 2002-01-23 at 15:34, Blizbor wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Eric, is it possible to correct one big mistake in the anaconda ?
> During install process on i686 instaler chooses binaries compiled
> fir i686 platform which makes such a instal unusable on Pentium MMX,
> K6, Cyrix etc.
-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>