| To: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS Inode Size question. |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:06:48 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>, Linux XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1011739906.31579.13.camel@UberGeek> |
| References: | <20020122233152.B2756@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1011739906.31579.13.camel@UberGeek> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:51:46PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: > Ok. As a close to this, I'd like to inquire if this will adversely > affect a 300GB database running on this machine? > Once the File's have been created, the Inodes are taken already, so I > don't see that as being a problem, but if memory consumption is an > issue, I wanted to ask so I know if it will become unstable after 30 > days, 90 days, etc of constant use and data influx. I don't think it'll be a problem for database load. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS Inode Size question., Austin Gonyou |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS Inode Size question., Austin Gonyou |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS Inode Size question., Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS Inode Size question., Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |