| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel |
| From: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:08:50 -0600 |
| Cc: | Stuart Luppescu <s-luppescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201211207450.14719-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 |
Eric Sandeen wrote: I don't know how cleanly the XFS patch will apply against the -mjc tree, my only suggestion would be to try it and see, and if you have problems with conflicts that you can't resolve, someone on the list may be able to help. -Eric On 21 Jan 2002, Stuart Luppescu wrote:I read on the Gentoo web site (http://www.gentoo.org/) that they are using Michael Cohen's new kernel with XFS and it is tremendously fast and stable. However, there is no indication on how to patch the thing. In the mjc section of kernel.org there is a patch, 2.4.17-2.4.18-pre3-mjc3.patch which appears to be against a plain 2.4.17 kernel. And we can get xfs patches from oss.sgi.com. But in what order do we apply the patches? Do we apply the mjc patch first and then the 2.4.18 xfs patch, or the 2.4.17 xfs patch and the the mjc patch? Daniel Robbins of gentoo has been in touch with me separately about problemsthey are having with xfs in this tree - filesystem corruption. So I would hold off for a while. We are attempting to workout what is going wrong. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | DMAPI and dm_set_return_on_destroy, James A Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |