xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs for parisc-linux

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs for parisc-linux
From: Randolph Chung <randolph@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 22:17:36 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <27820.1011505587@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020120051554.GL21816@xxxxxxxxx> <27820.1011505587@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Randolph Chung <randolph@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
> It looks like you started from an old XFS patch, XFS 2.4.17 has changed
> since 1.0.2.  The changes to Configure.help, Makefile,
> arch/i386/kernel/entry.S and arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S are from an older
> XFS patch. 

Yes, it's possibly old, but that's all I could find from the xfs web
page... http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/102_release.html. Thanks for the
pointer to the other location for downloading the patch.

> Also your patch contains changes which do not appear to be
> XFS related, lclear_user is added to parisc_ksyms.c, pdc_cons.c has
> changes to EARLY_BOOTUP_DEBUG, AFAICT neither are used by XFS.

the patch is against current parisc-linux cvs. The changes are needed to
get xfs to compile. The unrelated fixes (lclear_user) is a bug with the
current kernel tree and is being reviewed for inclusion.
EARLY_BOOTUP_DEBUG is, well, just a debug option.. :)

> That is all of XFS without kdb or kbuild.  Save this patched version of
> hppa 2.4.17 then make any changes that are required to get XFS working
> on hppa.  A diff of the saved version against the working version will
> show what you had to change to get XFS working on hppa.  It should be
> very little, ideally the only changes will be for system calls and
> defconfigs.

yes, that is right. there are only three changes needed for hppa for
syscalls and the fcntl constant. defconfig is already updated in the sgi
patch i believe. I hope to check the syscall/fcntl changes into our
parisc-linux cvs RSN so that the patch will work as is... but for now,
for people who want to test xfs on parisc, you need the whole thing...

I'll check out the newer patchset and see if there are any differences.

thanks,
randolph
-- 
   @..@                                         http://www.TauSq.org/
  (----)
 ( >__< )
 ^^ ~~ ^^


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>