| To: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent |
| From: | Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:48:21 +0100 |
| Cc: | Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3C44255B.8090008@xxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 13:49:31 +0100 |
| References: | <20020110183051.A1483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1010688121.676.111.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020115132520.C1593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3C44255B.8090008@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 2002.01.15 13:49:31 +0100 Stephen Lord wrote: Please try this with the current cvs tree - there was a change in the last week which fixed some problems with mmapped I/O under heavy memory pressure (the emacs build problemmentioned on the list). Hi, It started to looks ugly :( Still problem, but ... I have 2 SCSI drives, and 1 IDE.The system is on sda and sdb drives, hda is for storage of unfrequently needed things. So, my /tmp is on /sdb3. And, as I said, xfs on sdb3 + vmware = vmware crash ext2 on sdb3 + vmware = OKbut I tried to put it on another partition, the only free I have is sda4, and: both xfs and ext2 on sda4 + vmware = OK.So I supposed, there is some problem with the drive, so I ran badblocks -v -w, but it didn't found any errors. And the only thing which crashes is vmware, all other stuff works perfectly. So I think, that drive is OK. Anyone has any ideas? Regards,Olaf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question: why does dbench take so much longer to run on XFSthen ext2 file system, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocen t, Austin Gonyou |
| Previous by Thread: | rmap-11b + XFS.., Shawn Starr |
| Next by Thread: | Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocen t, Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |