| To: | Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux |
| From: | Sean Neakums <sneakums@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:33:42 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201151559270.15987-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Dan Hollis's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:01:28 -0800 (PST)") |
| Mail-followup-to: | Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201151559270.15987-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
begin Dan Hollis quotation: > Its too bad theres no signal mechanism for userspace for 'memory >low', eg SIGLOWMEM so userspace apps could voluntarily release >resources to ease memory pressure. There was a big discussion on LKML about that a few months back. I forget what the outcome was. -- ///////////////// | | The spark of a pin <sneakums@xxxxxxxx> | (require 'gnu) | dropping, falling feather-like. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | | There is too much noise. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - xfsrestore, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - pagebuf, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux, Dan Hollis |
| Next by Thread: | Re[2]: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux, Keith Matthews |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |