| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux |
| From: | Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:01:28 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1011136707.13548.249.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 15 Jan 2002, Steve Lord wrote: > Does not fail can also mean does not return for a VERY long time. Plus > the memory system on Irix has a mechanism where various subsystems which > consume memory can register callouts which the memory system can call > to ask them to release memory. Linux does not have the latter except > for the explicit calls in page_launder or what ever it is called this > week. Its too bad theres no signal mechanism for userspace for 'memory low', eg SIGLOWMEM so userspace apps could voluntarily release resources to ease memory pressure. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - cleanup xfs default config options, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: things to do in brooklyn when your filesystem is dead, Nathan J. Mehl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux, Sean Neakums |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |