xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Cc: James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1011136707.13548.249.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 15 Jan 2002, Steve Lord wrote:
> Does not fail can also mean does not return for a VERY long time. Plus
> the memory system on Irix has a mechanism where various subsystems which
> consume memory can register callouts which the memory system can call
> to ask them to release memory. Linux does not have the latter except
> for the explicit calls in page_launder or what ever it is called this
> week.

Its too bad theres no signal mechanism for userspace for 'memory low', eg 
SIGLOWMEM so userspace apps could voluntarily release resources to ease 
memory pressure.

-Dan
-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>