| To: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent |
| From: | Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:14:17 +0100 |
| Cc: | Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3C44255B.8090008@xxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 13:49:31 +0100 |
| References: | <20020110183051.A1483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1010688121.676.111.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020115132520.C1593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3C44255B.8090008@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 2002.01.15 13:49:31 +0100 Stephen Lord wrote: Please try this with the current cvs tree - there was a change in the last week which fixed some problems with mmapped I/O under heavy memory pressure (the emacs build problemmentioned on the list). Which branch: 2.4 or 2.5? I would prefer 2.4 if possible :) Regards, Olaf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent, Stephen Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Oops with 2.4.17 (CVS from today), Juri Haberland |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent, Stephen Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |