xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS is innocent - was: vmware+XFS+duron+viakt133 - works?

To: Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS is innocent - was: vmware+XFS+duron+viakt133 - works?
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Jan 2002 12:42:01 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020110183051.A1483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020110183051.A1483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 11:30, Olaf Frączyk wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed clean RH7.2 on one free partition on my machine. Removed 
> RH gcc, installed compat-egcs, compiled new kernel (2.4.17) with xfs 
> (using the same sources as previous) and ... no problems.
> So I moved kernel, modules to my working system, and ... it works.
> So something with my system is wrong, and the problems are not XFS related.
> Now, I have to find what :((
> Or compiler, or glibc I suppose.
> I have RH 7.1, with updated glibc to 2.2.4-14 (on the new installed 7.2 is 
> 2.2.4-13), and I use egcs from RH 6.x. And on the new I installed 
> compat-egcs and compat-glibc-6.2-2.1.3.2.

I have pretty good luck with the compiler from redhat rawhide, gcc-2.96-101

I have plain old PIII chips in all my boxes though.

Steve

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Olaf Fraczyk
-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>