| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Unable to get XFS, ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 09 Jan 2002 16:39:36 -0600 |
| Cc: | Adrian Head <ahead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1010615039.17321.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200201020451.g024pPg00867@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1010615039.17321.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 16:23, Eric Sandeen wrote: > I tested snapshot creation & overflow with ext2, ext3, reiser, and xfs. > I have not looked closely enough to see why xfs breaks w/o this patch, > and why it works with it, but... give it a shot. Ah, ok. Steve pointed out that in the stock LVM version, unsigned long blocks[KIO_MAX_SECTORS]; plops 4k down on the stack; xfs's stack must be a bit bigger than other filesystems, and it overflows... that's why xfs was failing with that code, and other filesystems survived. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unable to get XFS, ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Partition un(mount|repairable), Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unable to get XFS, ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unable to get XFS, ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily, Adrian Head |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |