[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Anyone know what this error means?

To: Adam McKenna <adam-dated-1010968404.3db79f@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Anyone know what this error means?
From: Walt H <waltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 19:13:41 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20020109003323.GW4511@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20020107

Not sure if this is relevant, but it might be. Seems as though there's a kernel bug preventing creation of some large filesystems - See:


Also, in the event you can't get though, there's a patch at:




Adam McKenna wrote:

This is an approx. 270 Gig RAID5 partition on an AMI Megaraid card on
2.2.14-xfs (snapshot)..

I get the following error when trying to create the filesystem:

adam@braindb:~$ sudo mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sda9
mkfs.xfs: warning - cannot set blocksize on block device /dev/sda9: Invalid
meta-data=/dev/sda9              isize=256    agcount=65, agsize=1048576 blks
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=67782243, imaxpct=25
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks, unwritten=0
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=8274
realtime =none                   extsz=65536  blocks=0, rtextents=0
File size limit exceeded

The same thing happens if I try ext2:

adam@braindb:~$ sudo mke2fs /dev/sda9
mke2fs 1.22, 22-Jun-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=4096 (log=2)
Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
33898496 inodes, 67782243 blocks
3389112 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
First data block=0
2069 block groups
32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
16384 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks: 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872

File size limit exceeded

adam@braindb:~$ uname -a
Linux braindb 2.4.14-xfs #3 SMP Fri Nov 30 01:58:14 PST 2001 i686 unknown

Anyone know what is going on here?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>