xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS fails fsx-linux.c (1 charactor difference)

To: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS fails fsx-linux.c (1 charactor difference)
From: Shawn Starr <spstarr@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:43:55 -0500 (EST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3C38B3B7.3070000@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
you may need to #define linux  in the sources as it was ported.

On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Stephen Lord wrote:

> Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> >With an exaustive test running overnight with the new -mjc branch of 2.4
> >(I'm working on getting XFS into the branch) I noticed the following
> >fault:
> >
> >truncating to largest ever: 0x3fcb9
> >READ BAD DATA: offset = 0x53e5, size = 0x9c0a
> >OFFSET  GOOD    BAD     RANGE
> >0x 9000 0x0000  0x0101  0x 5faa
> >operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 1
> >LOG DUMP (1145 total operations):
> >
> >I have attached the dump of the results run and the binary difference is
> >ONE charactor:
> >
> >cmp boom boom.fsxgood
> >boom boom.fsxgood differ: char 10428, line 18
> >
> >It would be a good idea to use the fsx-linux.c program to stress test XFS.
> >The fsx-linux program has found several bugs in NFS and other filesystems.
> >
> >Shawn.
> >
> Google does not have any references to this program - can you provide a
> pointer?
>
> Thanks
>
>    Steve
>
>
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>