begin Steve Lord quotation:
> On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 03:03, Sean Neakums wrote:
>> begin D. Stimits quotation:
>> I'm not getting any errors at the unpack stage. I mentioned that I
>> was unpacking fresh for each try in order to establish that the tree
>> itself was not b0rked. Note from my previous messages that the builds
>> have only failed when I built on XFS, and not when I built on ext2,
>> and that builds on XFS have succeeded when I use 2.4.14-pre7. This
>> just doesn't feel random to me.
>>
>
> Since I am building on a redhat based box, I am doing rpm builds not
> debian package builds, and the rpm version which appears friendly to
> this box is emacs-20 not emacs-21. Having said that, emacs is building
> OK for me here. It is difficult to tell if the problem you are seeing
> is in the true emacs build, or in the package generation. Can you tell,
> if it is the package generation then the rpm build is not a valid test
> case here.
I don't even get as far as generating packages when I build on XFS;
the part I mentioned about temacs re-appearing mysteriously happens
during the actual emacs21 build.
I can't remember if I've mentioned it before, but Ive run xfs_repair
on the FS in question, with no errors reported. Ugh, this sure is
weird and crazy.
--
///////////////// | | The spark of a pin
<sneakums@xxxxxxxx> | (require 'gnu) | dropping, falling feather-like.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | | There is too much noise.
|