| To: | Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: New Kernel RPMs |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 24 Jan 2002 09:46:27 -0600 |
| Cc: | "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <35F87783B600D411A1430060943F469A589756@EXCHANGE> |
| References: | <35F87783B600D411A1430060943F469A589756@EXCHANGE> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 09:44, Matthijs van der Klip wrote: > > The tricky part with all of this is we probably should to fold in the > > appropriate xfs fixes from the cvs tree, there are a lot of them since > > these rpms were spun. > > But then it wouldn't be an 'official' release (1.0.2) anymore, would it? But then why would we bother with the redhat update at all? Same argument applies in my mind. Steve > > > Regards, > > Matthijs van der Klip -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New Kernel RPMs, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: New Kernel RPMs, Matthijs van der Klip |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: New Kernel RPMs, Matthijs van der Klip |
| Next by Thread: | RE: New Kernel RPMs, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |