xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocen t

from [Stephen Lord] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocen t
From: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 04:14:45 -0600
Cc: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20020117194821.A3800@venus.local.navi.pl> <1011293832.26356.13.camel@UberGeek> <20020122185130.A1579@venus.local.navi.pl> <1011724405.1281.46.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20020123093608.A2386@venus.local.navi.pl>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 
Olaf Fr1czyk wrote:

On 2002.01.22 19:33:25 +0100 Steve Lord wrote:

On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 11:51, Olaf Fr1czyk wrote:
> So, what do you suggest to try next?

Have you tried a current cvs kernel from oss.sgi.com?

I use kernel from 16 Jan from cvs.
OK. I will do update, and let you know if something changes.

Regards,

Olaf 

Ouch!

Any chance you could update that past 17th Jan? There was a major bug fix
the day after you picked up the code.

Steve



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocen t, Olaf Frączyk
Next by Date:  Onstream Tape Driver Kernel Bug????, Jochen Weiss
Previous by Thread:  Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocen t, Olaf Frączyk
Next by Thread:  Re: XFS is innocent - was: vmware+XFS+duron+viakt133 - works?, Olaf Frączyk
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]