xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS Inode Size question.

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS Inode Size question.
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 22 Jan 2002 16:51:46 -0600
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>, Linux XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020122233152.B2756@wotan.suse.de>
References: <20020122233152.B2756@wotan.suse.de>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ok. As a close to this, I'd like to inquire if this will adversely
affect a 300GB database running on this machine? 
Once the File's have been created, the Inodes are taken already, so I
don't see that as being a problem, but if memory consumption is an
issue, I wanted to ask so I know if it will become unstable after 30
days, 90 days, etc of constant use and data influx.

On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 16:31, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:25:31PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > Andi,
> >   Thanks for this note. This will help greatly. Is there anything that
> I
> > can do to resolve this issue? A patch or something in /proc perhaps? 
> 
> Not really.  Just ignore it for now. 
> 
> -Andi
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>