xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel
From: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:14:43 -0600
Cc: Stuart Luppescu <s-luppescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201211207450.14719-100000@chuckle.americas.sgi.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020122004128.034dd258@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226
Seth Mos wrote:

At 15:08 21-1-2002 -0600, Stephen Lord wrote:

Eric Sandeen wrote:

Daniel Robbins of gentoo has been in touch with me separately about problems
they are having with xfs in this tree - filesystem corruption. So I would hold off
for a while. We are attempting to workout what is going wrong.


I suggest that people test a 2.4.17 release well before using it in production. This is the first time that I see a lot off people with filesystem corruption (not to be confused with oopses).

2.4.17 _is_ working alright for a lot of people as well but it is not safe perse.
And looking from the gentoo page there are no fixes in 18-pre3 that help out XFS since this probably means they are still seeing problems.


People who want to be absolutely safe might better well use 2.4.16. At least that one didn't make filesystem corruption afaik.


Filesystem corruption at the start of the fs should be gone now in the cvs code, and this was happening
after forced shutdown. If someone thinks they have an open corruption issue with 2.4.17 please tell
us about it, nothing I have seen so far has been caused by 2.4.17, rather people seem to be doing more
things and pushing more problems out into the open. The mjc kernel is a different matter - but then
the patch from 2.4.17 is 5.3Mbytes in size.


Steve



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>