| To: | Stuart Luppescu <s-luppescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:17:06 +0100 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Linux XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1011647781.4096.24.camel@musuko.uchicago.edu> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201211207450.14719-100000@chuckle.americas.sgi.com> <1011647781.4096.24.camel@musuko.uchicago.edu> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> The question is, is there anything sacred about the number 11? Can't I > just assign it any unused number? Or am I going to make my system go up > in smoke? In theory the numbers are an fixed/published ABI (arguments of the sysctl(2) system call). In practice near everybody uses /proc/sys/ and names instead of specifying integer numbers, so it's usually not a problem to change the number of an sysctl arbitarily. In fact the numbering may go away in 2.5, because most people agree it was a mistake to support numbers instead of names only. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | DMAPI and dm_set_return_on_destroy, James A Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How to use Michael Cohen's kernel, Stephen Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |