xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re[2]: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux
From: Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:27:43 +0000 (GMT)
In-reply-to: <6ulmeymyh5.fsf@zork.zork.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201151559270.15987-100000@sasami.anime.net>, <6ulmeymyh5.fsf@zork.zork.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:33:42 +0000 Sean Neakums <Sean Neakums 
<sneakums@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:

> begin  Dan Hollis quotation:

> > Its too bad theres no signal mechanism for userspace for 'memory
> >low', eg SIGLOWMEM so userspace apps could voluntarily release
> >resources to ease memory pressure.

> There was a big discussion on LKML about that a few months back.  I
> forget what the outcome was.

Implementation on these things can be crucial.

A few years ago I was having trouble with Oracle on an ICL Unix box
(though I think the vendor was immateriel). periodically when it tried
to get extra resources it would go into a tight loop, grabbing all
available CPU. We eventually concluded it was calling malloc, not
getting as much as it wanted, calling malloc........ . I'm sure you get
the picture.

--
Keith Matthews
Frequentous Consultants  - Linux Services, 
                Oracle development & database administration



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>