On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 09:34, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2002 09:19:50 -0600, Steve Lord wrote:
> >This output:
> >dir 1426370585 block 8388614 extra leaf entry 62b7eea7 2a89
> >dir ino 1426370585 missing leaf entry for 62bdaea7/2a89
> Bingo, the missing name is du.name = "069746IM.Mrw"
> This starts to be great fun!! :-)
> Anything else I should do?
Hmm, explain why the correct hash value for this name is 0x62bdaea7,
yet we created a leaf entry with the wrong hash value of 0x62b7eea7
Is there any chance you can create another instance of the problem,
that version you had repair output for would have been very interesting
since it was in a single block directory, not a hulking great beast
like this one is in.
I presume the name is a legitimate one from the source tree.
> Verkaufe Original-BMW-Raeder: L I N U X .~.
> http://adsl-bergs.rz.rwth-aachen.de/~rabe The Choice /V\
> of a GNU /( )\
> Generation ^^-^^
Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx