On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 14:29, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> What is the affected version with this? 2.4.17 or all?
Well I hit it in 2.5.2-pre7, but I suspect it goes back into 2.4.16
at least. I may have made a mistake in the changes which went in
to fix various things during 2.4.16.
> On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 14:07, Steve Lord wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 12:54, Sean Neakums wrote:
> > > begin Sean Neakums quotation:
> > >
> > > > I am now going to do a build of the upstream source and see if I can
> > > > make the dump break on that too. I'm hopeful that it will, as the
> > > > unexec code is the same in upstream as in the Debian emacs21
> > > > package.
> > >
> > > Yep, I just got me a dumped emacs binary full of NULs with the
> > > original GNU source.
> > OK, bingo, I can replicate this now, I too have a bad binary, it looks
> > like the memory is getting reclaimed without getting flushed out to
> > disk - which is not good at all.
> > This actually gives me something to go on, hopefully it won't take too
> > long to find now. Thanks for your persistance in generating a test
> > case here.
> > Steve
> > --
> > Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511
> > Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
> Austin Gonyou
> Systems Architect, CCNA
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-698-7250
> email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
> Latin Proverb
Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx