Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>]

I did it this way (XFS first) and I don't recall any problems.  If there
was a merge conflict, it was trivial to resolve.

-Eric

On Wed, 2001-12-26 at 17:36, drr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Alp ATICI wrote:
> 
> > Which patch should we apply to the kernel first?

> My general rule is to apply bigger, more intrusive patches first, so I do
> XFS before preemption.
> 
> Dave