| To: | Alp ATICI <atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS |
| From: | drr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Dec 2001 16:36:35 -0700 (MST) |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.40.0112261804480.11265-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Alp ATICI wrote: > Which patch should we apply to the kernel first? > XFS or Love's preemptive kernel patch to have them work > at the same time. > Any problems reported so far? > Thanks, > Alp My general rule is to apply bigger, more intrusive patches first, so I do XFS before preemption. Dave -- David Richardson <drr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> We aim to please. Ourselves, mostly, but we do aim to please. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS, Alp ATICI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS, Alp ATICI |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |