xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs root + lvm [OT?]

To: pelux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs root + lvm [OT?]
From: Adam Cioccarelli <alciocca@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 20:27:37 +0100
Cc: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3C233724.9050004@xxxxxxx>
References: <200112211237.fBLCbwX05808@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3C233724.9050004@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ciao Stefano,

what Steve says is true there are a number of user space binaries that are 
needed to initialize the logical volumes so if they are on a logical volume you 
can't use them to activate the logical volume!! Anyway from my personal 
experience I would always go with a small root filesystem on a normal partition 
and everything else on logical volumes. Unless you have a LVM + XFS rescue disk 
or CD ;)

Adam


On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 07:20:36 -0600
Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Stefano Peluchetti wrote:
> 
> >It could be OT.. anyway i could'nt  find any other place to ask that .
> >I want to use a root xfs partition at the top of a LV.
> >I don't know if it is possible (in the only howto i have found the /boot dir 
> >is outside the LV)...and i also can' t understand why i have to use the 
> >lvmcrate_initrd command! If i load the lvm support  in kernel (not module!) 
> >i 
> >can't see the prob. It chould be like mounting a xfs root partition (where 
> >you need kernel (NOT MODULE) support).
> >Or am i missing something?
> >This becouse i don't like to have lot of partition! I want to have 
> >everything 
> >in my LV.
> >Thanks for help! :)
> >Stefano
> >
> I think there is user space initialization required for lvm volumes - 
> the config of the
> volume has to be loaded into the kernel from user space. This is the way 
> it was the
> last time I heard Heinz talk, it may no longer be true. However if it is 
> the case you
> need a bootstrap mechanism to get the root lvm volume configured before 
> you can
> mount it.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>