xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS dying when many processes copy many files/directories

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS dying when many processes copy many files/directories
From: Adrian Head <ahead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:35:22 +1000
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112161937450.12284-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112161937450.12284-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks,

I have tried the CVS from yesterday and it appears to work well.  I have run 
3 tests so far and the machine hasn't faulted yet which is a good sign.  I 
will continue with my testing ;-)

I hope everyone has a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:39, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> From looking at these traces, it looks very much like the problem which
> was solved just recently... I'd bet $0.02 that the latest CVS code will
> solve your problems.  (Note that the cvs snapshot patch is not the latest
> CVS code.)
>
> -Eric

P.S. Eric - which problem do you think this was?  The reason I ask is back in 
Sep I had a go at getting XFS to run but it wouldn't pass the tests so I had 
to drop it because of lack of time.  I'm just interested  :-)

- -- 
Adrian Head

(Public Key available on request.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8IJed8ZJI8OvSkAcRAnjsAJ0TSSNUa0PQATnVQFe0Cf5C2GilZQCfdi62
27E2+NaMMyt0mSdMMAn8bhA=
=OsvF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>