xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Linux w/XFS on Athlon systems

To: "Gabe E. Nydick" <gnydick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Linux w/XFS on Athlon systems
From: Tim Wiess <harlequin@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 12:19:14 -0800
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, "Drew 'Cheetah!' Maxwell" <cheetah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jesse Hall <jdhall@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <B835232B.9B6%gnydick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I recently put together a dual Athlon system, and initially I couldn't
even get
it to run for more than 30 minutes with a panic. The problem turned out
to a lack
of power. I replaced the 300W power supply I had with a 400W and now the
machine
runs beautifully. If you are testing a dual Athlon configuration, I
recommend
checking that.

tim


"Gabe E. Nydick" wrote:
> 
> Seth,
> 
>     The system we have works fine with 1000 simultaneous bonnie++ processes
> running under a PIII kernel.  Do you think it could still be the memory?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gabe
> 
> On 12/6/01 11:35 AM, "Seth Mos" <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Drew 'Cheetah!' Maxwell wrote:
> >
> >> Jesse Hall wrote:
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---
> >>>
> >>> What do you mean by "haven't worked"?
> >>>
> >>> I've been  using a Tyan Thunder K7 with dual Athlon MPs with XFS (tracking
> >>> CVS) for a few months with great reliability and stability.
> >>>
> >> By "haven't worked", I mean generating a Kernel Oops, and never being able 
> >> to
> >> finish bringing the system up to multiuser mode. (It'll die somewhere in 
> >> the
> >> midst of the interactive menus as it brings up daemons.)
> >
> > Sounds to me like RAM with a lot of holes in it.
> >
> > Get some/new other ones and make sure that the processor is not
> > overheating and such.
> >
> > Cheers
> >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>