| To: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?! |
| From: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 05 Dec 2001 20:40:32 -0600 |
| Cc: | stimits@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <3C0EA9D1.53E1E1E8@xxxxxxxxxx> <1007604203.2985.0.camel@UberGeek> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 |
Austin Gonyou wrote: It is wholly possible that NTFS could be like OpenBSD's filesystem, in that it is technically not "journaling", but is soft updates? This would offer the stability, but at a speed hit, which seems to be right on partwith Windows(tm) usual stuff. NTFS does journalling, but quite different from XFS - they record the state of a data structure before and after a metadata change - which makes it possible to unwind transactions. There is a book on it, but I am not sure it is still in print. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, Austin Gonyou |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface, Daniel Phillips |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, D. Stimits |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |