xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Syscall number

To: Juer Lee <Juer.Lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Syscall number
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:13:34 +1100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1007577444.28030.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from sandeen@xxxxxxx on Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 12:37:24PM -0600
References: <EB0AF92C5F6B6B45A3EC7A2608347EC01E12BA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1007577444.28030.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 12:37:24PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Hi Juer - 
> 
> There is an ongoing discussion on LKML about this very subject - some of
> it has been cross-posted to this list as well.
> 
> The short answer is that there are not standard numbers available yet,
> but it's in the works.
> 
> -Eric
> 
> On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 06:03, Juer Lee wrote:
> > Hi, All ( XFS team ),
> > 
> > We have been testing XFS ACL on Power PC with linux-2.4.5-xfs-1.0.1 for
> > 4 months already, we still haven't found any big problems,  so it seems
> > that it is the time to add syscall number for ACL.
> > There are three syscall number which need to be added: __NR__attrctl,
> > __NR__acl_get and __NR__acl_set.
> > 

The one thing we do know is that there will need to be an
interface change, so it wont be these three syscalls that
we end up with.

> > 
> > Can anybody tell me how to apply them as standard numbers?
> > 

Nope - be sure to let us know if you find out how!  ;)

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>