| To: | Xianglong Yuan <yuanx@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?! |
| From: | Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:16:22 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20011205140358.F3446@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Xianglong Yuan wrote: > I just cross-by an excellent article on various journaling > techniques used in ext3. > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fs8.html It looks like tux2 is taking a different approach, and one of the goals is total data integrity -- not just metadata. They are using phase trees. It's been described as "failsafe" whereas XFS and most other journaling fs are just "crash resistant". http://people.nl.linux.org/~phillips/tux2/phase.tree.tutorial.html -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-] |
| Previous by Date: | Re: compilers, Adam Cioccarelli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: compilers, Jean Francois Martinez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, D. Stimits |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |