| To: | Jean Francois Martinez <jfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: compilers |
| From: | Adam Cioccarelli <alciocca@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 05 Dec 2001 23:11:39 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Linux XFS (E-mail)" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <FED7EB450413D511ABC100B0D02117323A0769@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1007585421.2026.0.camel@UberGeek> <3C0E9977.7EEF4D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 |
In what way?I have been using gcc 3.0 and gcc 3.0.2 for some time now without any problems... Adam Jean Francois Martinez wrote: Austin Gonyou wrote:This is not true. RH 7.1 gcc is not broke(as in can't compile code that runs), but there was an update to it which fixed certain issues. You definitely CAN compile kernels with that default gcc though that will boot. Will you have problems? ymmv. The best course of action is to either get gcc3, or update your current gcc from updates.redhat.com.Gcc3 is known to NOT work with kernel. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: compilers, Jean Francois Martinez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, Dan Hollis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: compilers, Jean Francois Martinez |
| Next by Thread: | Re: compilers, Jean Francois Martinez |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |