| To: | Blake Barnett <blake.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Stable XFS+Kernel combo |
| From: | Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:18:31 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1007426524.28458.8.camel@shiva> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
I'm using the 2.4.14 rpm from the oss.sgi site, and it's been working fine, so far. On 3 Dec 2001, Blake Barnett wrote: > In the opinion of the XFS masters, what would be the most stable > XFS-enabled kernel at this point? I've been using 2.4.9+XFS for a > while and it seems pretty solid. But I'm wondering if one of the newer > ones is working out very well. I'd like to get the benefits of the new > VM, etc. > > I'm about to put a server in production with some large filesystems and > I'd like to use XFS, I don't want to have to upgrade the kernel for a > while on this box though... > > Suggestions/Opinions please! > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Stable XFS+Kernel combo, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE - work around acl/intermezzo problems., Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Stable XFS+Kernel combo, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - Sync with kdb v1.9-2.4.16-i386, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |