| To: | "Matt Avila" <mavila@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FW: Suggestions on Emulex Driver build w XFS |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 09 Dec 2001 13:21:50 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Sat, 08 Dec 2001 21:13:27 CDT." <005501c18057$173cb890$c8010a0a@lightning> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:13:27 -0500, "Matt Avila" <mavila@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I do not want to get into a situation that if/when the system is further >upgraded that I have to worry about continual kernel modifications. >Would I be correct in assuming that <<IF>> I build and install as >loadable modules this will not be an issue? That is a different question. Binary only modules are accepted by Linus, but that just covers the legal angle. It says nothing about whether the drivers will work with a new kernel or not, you have to ask the driver supplier if it is safe to upgrade your kernel. The Emulex web site says that it was tested on RH 7.1 and kernel 2.4.4, for any other kernel version you will have to ask Emulex. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: FW: Suggestions on Emulex Driver build w XFS, Matt Avila |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FW: Suggestions on Emulex Driver build w XFS, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: FW: Suggestions on Emulex Driver build w XFS, Matt Avila |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FW: Suggestions on Emulex Driver build w XFS, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |