| To: | Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How to fsck read-only-mounted root filesystem? |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 06 Dec 2001 09:10:28 +0100 |
| Cc: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux xfs ml <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.30.0112052247550.16621-100000@anime.net> |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20011206073426.035a3d88@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 22:48 5-12-2001 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Seth Mos wrote: > At 13:40 5-12-2001 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote: > >On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Simon Matter wrote: > > > Dan Hollis schrieb: > > > > How can one xfs_check/xfs_repair a root filesystem? > > > Boot from a bootable CD and perform the repair on the unmounted > > > filesystem. > > > Have a look at this http://lbt.linuxcare.com/index.epl > >Seems a bit ridiculous to have to install a CDrom just to fsck the root > >filesystem. > Install what? You don't install anything. You just boot from the CD, fix > stuff and then reboot. I always carry one around when I am going to maintain a server. I have a server at a colo which doesn't have a cdrom drive either. I just take one with me when I go there. I am forced to take the machine out of the rack anyways if I am going do something to it. But fixing a corrupt fs while the system is online is not reassuring for me either. > It takes a bit more time yes, but 5 minutes at most of the corruption is > not serious.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: using xfsdump to synchronise filesystems?, Matthijs van der Klip |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How to fsck read-only-mounted root filesystem?, Dan Hollis |
| Next by Thread: | [Offtopic] Re: How to fsck read-only-mounted root filesystem?, nic |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |